You are here
Home > Grammar

A tonal grammar of Etsakọ by Baruch Elimelech

By Baruch Elimelech

Show description

Read Online or Download A tonal grammar of Etsakọ PDF

Best grammar books

Style Guide: The Best Selling Guide to English Usage (11th Edition)

This increased 11th variation of the bestselling advisor to type relies at the Economist's personal up to date apartment sort guide, and is a useful better half for everybody who desires to speak with the readability, kind and precision for which the Economist is well known. because the creation says, 'clarity of writing often follows readability of idea.

Determiners: Universals and variation (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today)

This quantity brings jointly fresh paintings at the formal and interpretational homes of determiners throughout quite a few typologically and geographically unrelated languages. It seeks to respond to the center query of contemporary linguistic thought: Which homes of languages are common and that are variable?

Rightward Movement

Symmetries and asymmetries have continually performed a tremendous function in linguistic theorizing. From the early works on most likely common homes of transformational strategies, adjustments among rightward and leftward stream approaches have been famous and constituted a problem to theories of stipulations on alterations.

Additional resources for A tonal grammar of Etsakọ

Example text

On the other hand, it includes information about the changing syntacticosemantic properties of the element in question, that is, the transition from a referential pronoun (with a deictic and/or anaphoric potential) to an agreement marker which does not have any referential potential on its own, but merely reflects the φ-set of an argument. . The fact that there are a few languages (mostly Creoles) which apparently exhibit non-bound agreement markers suggests that the phonological reduction involved in this process does not necessarily result in bound agreement formatives (cf.

He therefore concludes that the weak paradigm is the result of an impoverishment rule that deletes inflectional features in the presence of an inflected determiner (in most languages [gender] is deleted; the picture is more complex in languages with rich inflection such as German and Icelandic, see Sauerland 1996 for details). 15 From the above discussion, it has become clear that DM posits a strongly syntactic approach to the formation of words: morphosyntactic primitives are combined via the syntactic operations Merge and Move and then (eventually) spelled-out by phonological exponents.

However, if no determiner is present, the strong adjectival inflection must be chosen (mit gut-em Gewissen ‘with good conscience-dat’). In the presence of an indefinite article, a mixed paradigm is observed – the strong adjectival inflection appears if the article shows no agreement/inflection (ein gut-er Mann ‘a good mannom’), while the weak adjectival inflection shows up if the indefinite article carries agreement/inflection (ein-em gut-en Mann ‘a good man-dat’). Interestingly, Sauerland observes that the endings used in the weak paradigm are in fact a subset of the strong endings, namely the least marked (or default) endings of the strong inflection.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.16 of 5 – based on 41 votes
Top