You are here

# Algebraic methods for nonlinear control systems by Giuseppe Conte, Claude H. Moog, Anna Maria Perdon

By Giuseppe Conte, Claude H. Moog, Anna Maria Perdon

This is a self-contained creation to algebraic keep watch over for nonlinear structures appropriate for researchers and graduate scholars. it's the first ebook facing the linear-algebraic method of nonlinear keep watch over platforms in this kind of precise and large style. It offers a complementary method of the extra conventional differential geometry and bargains extra simply with a number of vital features of nonlinear systems.

Similar system theory books

Manifolds, tensor analysis, and applications

The aim of this ebook is to supply center fabric in nonlinear research for mathematicians, physicists, engineers, and mathematical biologists. the most target is to supply a operating wisdom of manifolds, dynamical platforms, tensors, and differential types. a few purposes to Hamiltonian mechanics, fluid mechanics, electromagnetism, plasma dynamics and regulate concept are given utilizing either invariant and index notation.

Stability analysis of nonlinear systems

One carrier arithmetic has rendered the 'Et moi, "', si j'avait su remark en revenir, je n'y serais element all. "' human race. It has placed good judgment again the place it belongs, at the topmost shelf subsequent Jules Verne to the dusty canister labelled 'discarded non sense'. The sequence is divergent; as a result we are able to do whatever with it.

Additional resources for Algebraic methods for nonlinear control systems

Sample text

N} . 6. 4) where ϕ˙ = δϕ. 7. Let ϕ be a function in KΣ such that dϕ ∈ X . The relative degree r of ϕ is given by r = inf {k ∈ IN , such that dϕ(k) ∈ X }. 5) In particular, we say that ϕ has ﬁnite relative degree if r belongs to IN and that ϕ has inﬁnite relative degree if r = ∞. 8. 9. 1), then (i) dϕ ∈ X 48 3 Accessibility (ii)ϕ has inﬁnite relative degree. Proof. 6) for any k ≥ 1. 6, this is not true for ω = dϕ and k = ν + 1. This ends the proof of statement (i). 7) for any k ≥ 1. 6. The notion of autonomous element can be deﬁned also in the context of nonexact forms.

Suﬃciency: Let {dξ1 , . . , dξk } be a basis of Hs+2 . From the construction of the subspaces Hi , Hs+1 = Hs+2 ⊕ spanK {du} Hs = Hs+2 ⊕ spanK {du, du} ˙ .. 22) H1 = Hs+2 ⊕ spanK {du, . . 15): x1 = ξ1 (y, y, ˙ . . , u(s) ) .. ˙ . . , u(s) ) xk = ξk (y, y, xk+1 = u .. 23) xk+s+1 = u(s) k From Hs+2 ⊂ Hs+1 , it follows dξ˙i = j=1 αdξ + βdu, for each j = 1, . . , k. Let x = (x1 , . . , xk ). 24) The assumption k > s indicates that the output y depends only on x. 14). Since the state-space system is proper, necessarily k > s.

The set A of autonomous elements of E is a subspace of E. Proof. 12, the proof becomes straightforward. Consider two vectors in A; their sum still has an inﬁnite relative degree. The same holds for the product of an element in A and a scalar function in KΣ . 15. 12) or, equivalently, there does not exist any nonzero autonomous element in K. A practical criterion for evaluating accessibility is given as follows. , a sequence of subspaces {Hk } of E such that each Hk , for k > 0, is the set of all one-forms with relative degree at least k.